[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071230183927.5a5a3c42@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:39:27 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
dpreed@...d.com, Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:14:40 +0100
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:
> On 30-12-07 17:48, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > For processors with TSC I think we should aim for 2.6.25 to do this and
> > to have the major other _p fixups done. I pity whoever does stuff like
> > the scc drivers but most of the rest isn't too bad.
>
> I'm by the way looking at drivers/net/wd.c which my 386 uses for its dual
> mode NE2000/WD8013 clone ISA NIC and while it specifically needs no delay at
> all it seems, the mixed use of out and outb_p seems to suggest that someone
> once thought about that. Would you advice sticking in a udelay(2) manually
> there?
I would need to dig out the documentation and NE2000 reference code if I
even still have them. From memory NE2K needs them but I don't know
offhand if the WD80x3 devices do, or if only some of them do. It'll also
depend on the port - the DPRAM is different to the 8390.
Don Becker wrote the drivers and at the time he tuned them carefully for
performance so I would expect delays to be the ones needed
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists