[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47780657.8020208@richardharman.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:57:59 -0500
From: Richard Harman <richard@...hardharman.com>
To: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
CC: pharon@...il.com, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:49:21 +0200
>
> Note that this problem is only related to AMD64 multi-core laptops. As
> far as I can see, devs might not invest much coding effort into this
> and instead say "Go buy an Intel laptop!", as this really is a hardware
> quirk. And if Andi Kleen is correct, this is not just a laptop vendors'
> problem, but AMD itself doesn't offer support for higher C-states.
>
I think I may have a monkey wrench to throw into this, I finally got
around to testing the C1E patch, and the port80 patch. End result:
port80 patch has zero effect on this laptop, and the C1E patch makes it
stable.
AMD C1E patch 'force_amd_c1e' (disabling the workaround):
hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
Time: hpet clocksource has been installed.
Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not functional.
Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 0
Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not functional.
Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 1
And with the C1E workaround enabled, the kernel doesn't whine that the
lapic isn't functional.
Those were the kernel messages I was trying to paste in my earlier
message, saying that the lapic works. Do I have a DV6000 laptop that is
a strange beast all in itself?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists