[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071230212820.0d53f389@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:28:20 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>, dpreed@...d.com,
Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
> fact even io_delay=udelay would be wrong because any problem will be
> less clearly triggerable and thus less bisectable/debuggable.
And if this eats someones disk because you drive the hardware out of spec
you are going to sit there and tell them to bisect it ? Lovely.
Ingo - put the christmas wine away and have a coffee. Now think first.
You won't bisect obscure timing triggered problems, and the _p users are
almost all for hardware where performance doesn't matter one iota (eg
CMOS).
This isn't even all down to the chipset internal logic - several of my
boxes have external CMOS NVRAM/RTC chips which are probably the same
design (if a little smaller) as ten years ago.
io_delay = none is exactly the same thing as CPU overclocking. Hard to
debug, unpredictable and stupid.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists