[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4778113A.4080801@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:44:26 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>, dpreed@...d.com,
Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>> It probably should actually HLT, to avoid sucking power, and stressing
>> the thermal system. We're dead at this point, and the early 486's
>> which had problems with HLT will lock up - we don't care.
>
> ok. Like the patch below?
>
Don't need the cli; we're already running with interrupts disabled.
I'd do:
while (1)
asm volatile("hlt");
... mostly on general principles.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists