[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4778266B.2060502@reed.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:14:51 -0500
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>,
hpa@...or.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Now what's interesting is that the outb to port 80 is *faster* than an
>> outb to an unused port, on my machine. So there's something there -
>> actually accepting the bus transaction. In the ancient 5150 PC, 80 was
>>
>
> Yes and I even told you a while back how to verify where it is. From the
> timing you get its not on the LPC bus but chipset core so pretty
> certainly an SMM trap as other systems with the same chipset don't have
> the bug. Probably all that is needed is a BIOS upgrade
>
>
Actually, I could see whether it was SMM trapping due to AMD MSR's that
would allow such trapping, performance or debug registers. Nothing was
set to trap with SMI or other traps on any port outputs. But I'm
continuing to investigate for a cause. It would be nice if it were a
BIOS-fixable problem. It would be even nicer if the BIOS were GPL...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists