[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712310045.24069.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:45:23 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it
The current asm-x86/msr.h does not actually define anything for (!__KERNEL__
&& __i386__). For x86_64, it fails to build due to u32/u64 types being used.
Simply not installing the header seems easiest to me. Otherwise, x86_64 will
need sanitizing and i386 should have things added back, otherwise it's just a
pointless empty header.
Signed-Off-By: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
---
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/Kbuild b/include/asm-x86/Kbuild
index 12db5a1..6453804 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/Kbuild
+++ b/include/asm-x86/Kbuild
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ header-y += boot.h
header-y += bootparam.h
header-y += debugreg.h
header-y += ldt.h
-header-y += msr-index.h
header-y += prctl.h
header-y += ptrace-abi.h
header-y += sigcontext32.h
@@ -14,7 +13,6 @@ header-y += vsyscall32.h
unifdef-y += e820.h
unifdef-y += ist.h
unifdef-y += mce.h
-unifdef-y += msr.h
unifdef-y += mtrr.h
unifdef-y += page_32.h
unifdef-y += page_64.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists