| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4778DC5B.4080601@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:11:07 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> To: Jose de la Mancha <hidalgoj@...e.fr> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID timeout parameter accessibility request Jose de la Mancha wrote: [] > Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> Not sure about Debian, but perhaps /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay >> does something? > > --> I'll check that out. Does someone know about how this "safe mode delay" > works ? It's about something entirely different. This parameter tells md after how much inactivity time to update the superblocks to indicate the array is "clean" - so that in case of power loss w/o shutting down the array, it will not require reconstruction. It has nothing to do with timeouts. By the way, linux raid is usually discussed at linux-raid@...r, not here. /mjt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists