[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.0.999.0712311517360.4211@be1.lrz>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:39:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, 7eggert@....de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>, dpreed@...d.com,
Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:53:02 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> > Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > > I've never seen code which would do that, and it was not suggested by any
> > > tutorial I ever saw. I'd expect any machine to break on all kinds of software
> > > if it required this. The only thing I remember being warned about is writing
> > > the index and the data register at the same time using outw, because that
> > > would write both registers at the same time on 16-bit-cards.
> > >
> >
> > And we use that, and have been for 15 years. I haven't seen any screams
> > of pain about it.
>
> Actually there were, and I sent numerous people patches for that back in
> ISA days.
Are you talking about VGA cards requiring a delay between outb index/outb
data, VGA cards barfing on outw or systems barfing on outb(0x80,42)?
--
Programming is an art form that fights back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists