[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:35:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, qbarnes@...il.com,
ananth@...ibm.com, jkenisto@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kprobes change kprobe_handler flow
* Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com> wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > Make the control flow of kprobe_handler more obvious.
> >
> > Collapse the separate if blocks/gotos with if/else blocks
> > this unifies the duplication of the check for a breakpoint
> > instruction race with another cpu.
>
> This is a patch derived from kprobe_handler of the ARM kprobes port.
> This further simplifies the current x86 kprobe_handler. The resulting
> definition is smaller, more readable, has no goto's and contains only
> a single call to get_kprobe.
hm, this patch does not apply to x86.git#mm, due to the fixes,
unifications and cleanups done there. Could you send a patch against -mm
or against x86.git? (see the tree-fetching instructions below) Thanks,
Ingo
--------------{ x86.git instructions }---------->
git-clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux-2.6.git
cd linux-2.6.git
git-branch x86
git-checkout x86
git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm
(do subsequent pulls via "git-pull --force", as we frequently rebase the
git tree. NOTE: this might override your own local changes, so do this
only if you dont mind about losing thse changes in that tree.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists