[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JA0mT-0008U2-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:25:01 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: tytso@....edu (Theodore Tso)
Cc: 7eggert@....de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
jengelh@...putergmbh.de, devzero@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bunk@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> The question is whether the size of the Unix domain sockets support is
> worth the complexity of yet another config option that we expose to
> the user. For the embedded world, OK, maybe they want to save 14k of
> non-swappable memory. But for the non-embedded world, given the 117k
> mandatory memory usage of sysfs, or the 124k memory usage of the core
> networking stack, never mind the 3 megabytes of memory used by objects
> in the kernel subdirectory, it's not clear that it's worth worrying
> over 14k of memory, especially when many Unix programs assume
> that Unix Domain Sockets are present.
That would make sense if we were proposing to get rid of the CONFIG_UNIX
question altogether for !CONFIG_EMBEDDED. However, the proposal here is
merely to eliminate the modular option but the CONFIG_UNIX prompt itself
will remain even without CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
This I think is quite pointless.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists