[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102123355.GB11208@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:33:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Cc: Quentin Barnes <qbarnes@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [CFT] Code clarification patch to Kprobes arch code
* Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Barnes <qbarnes@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Tested on x86.
>
> Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayahanalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
thanks Ananth, i've updated the patch.
btw., do you have some script that i could use to test kprobes
functionality? Right now the only time i notice kprobes regressions is
when randconfig picks up CONFIG_NET_TCPPROBE=y which activates kprobes.
It would be so much nicer if kprobes had some runs-during-bootup kind of
quick self-test, with all the important functionality unit-tested. Like
lib/locking-selftest.c, or CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=y.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists