[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801021428.25164.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:28:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> (David Brownell Cc:-ed too)
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > Well, we have the following test script in the userland suspend
> > package that is supposed to work right now:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> > date
> > cd /sys/class/rtc/rtc0
> > echo $(( $(cat since_epoch) + 20 )) > wakealarm
> > s2ram
> > date
> >
> > provided that the new rtc driver code is compiled (and the old one is not).
>
> ok, will try that. A stupid question. The old RTC driver is in
> drivers/char/rtc.c, and maps to:
>
> crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 135 Oct 25 18:02 /dev/rtc
>
> the new driver is in drivers/rtc/*, and maps to:
>
> crw-r--r-- 1 root root 254, 0 Dec 12 02:30 /dev/rtc0
>
> but all the x86 distro boxes i have access to make use of /dev/rtc.
> There's no symlink set up from /dev/rtc to /dev/rtc0 either. So it
> appears to me that the new RTC driver isnt actually utilized on most
> distributions.
I think so.
> shouldnt we provide a Kconfig way of replacing dev 10:135 with the new
> driver's 254:0 device? (while keeping all the current modes of operation
> as well, of course.) It's all supposed to be 100% ioctl ABI compatible
> with the old driver, right? That way distros could start migrating to it
> as well, without depending on any udev hackery.
Question for Dave. ;-)
> > > That way any suspend breakage would be detectable (and bisectable)
> > > in automated testing - if the resume does not come back after 10-20
> > > seconds then the test failed.
> >
> > Yes, but please note that some systems require user space
> > manipulations of the graphics adapter for suspend to work and to
> > detect a breakage of such a system you need to boot it into X and use
> > s2ram to suspend.
>
> yeah, i wouldnt expect graphics mode to come back without quirks. But it
> should still work fine over the network, right? (which is my main mode
> of testing anyway)
Well, if the graphics is sufficiently broken, it won't resume at all.
The "echo core > /sys/power/pm_test && echo mem > /sys/power/state" thing
should always work, though (IOW, if this doesn't work, we cartainly have a
bug).
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists