[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102151335.GA15898@does.not.exist>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:13:35 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] linux/{socket,stat}.h: change __GLIBC__ cruft to
__KLIBC__
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:37:50AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> The __GLIBC__ hacks were re-added to the headers because the klibc peeps want
> to be lazy. But rather than properly address things, they just wrongly left
> it as __GLIBC__. This patch changes the __GLIBC__ cruft to __KLIBC__ so real
> libcs don't get screwed due to kilbc's laziness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
> index c22ef1c..90af15b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/socket.h
> +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct __kernel_sockaddr_storage {
> /* _SS_MAXSIZE value minus size of ss_family */
> } __attribute__ ((aligned(_K_SS_ALIGNSIZE))); /* force desired alignment */
>
> -#if defined(__KERNEL__) || !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ < 2)
> +#if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__KLIBC__)
>...
This changes the semantics from "!glibc" to "klibc".
I'm a bit worried that such changes might break some of the other
libc's people use on Linux.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists