linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080102161846.GA2755@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:18:46 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	trem <tremyfr@...oo.fr>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1


* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> > BKL properties, that could be wrapped. I guess fixing the TTY code 
> > to have no BKL dependencies has a higher chance of success - given 
> > that Alan is working on it :-)
> 
> Bit by bit when I can face it, and with a lot of other people 
> contributing parts. Right now the BKL mostly protects the open/close 
> paths and those are *really* ugly

could we perhaps just replace it with a tty_mutex? (possibly a recursive 
one) I suspect by now most of the BKL dependencies there have become 
local to the tty code? Or are there deep VFS dependencies as well? (if 
yes, what type of dependencies?)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/