[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102193415.1d7af667@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:34:15 +0100
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, rjw@...k.pl, pavel@...e.cz,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, kay.sievers@...y.org, gregkh@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
(rev. 2)
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:12:54 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > > It'd need to have some NTP sync solution for RTC_LIB devices, but
> > > ISTR the gentime stuff still assumes an update_persistent_clock()
> > > that doesn't sleep ... and hence can't be used with I2C based RTCs.
> >
> > I still believe NTP sync stuff should be done outside of the kernel.
> > given the mean accuracy of RTC chips and other sync factors, imho
> > you haven't so much to gain with an in-kernel sync code.
>
> Then the kernel/time/ntp.c stuff should be removed on all systems?
I'd say yes, but I think that would be dangerous to my own life :)
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists