[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801021444290.2990-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:46:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] : Allow embedded developers USB options
normally reserved for OTG
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> perhaps the code size is arguable as to whether it really matters.
> the reason we want it is that we have a USB host controller that will
> not work with USB hubs, so we want to make sure the system does not
> attempt such things. (yes, such a USB host controller is retarded,
> but the decision was out of our hands.)
Just out of curiosity, how does a host controller manage to avoid
working with external hubs? Is it a matter of power consumption? It
seems to me that in all other respects a hub should appear the same as
any other USB device.
Or is it a question of whether the controller works when communicating
with devices behind an external hub? And if it is, what is the
difficulty?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists