linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: do not add new typedefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:37:35 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: do not add new typedefs - is that for real?

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > But yes, this is one of the rare cases where a typedef makes sense,
> > but ???'d call it osd_off_t or something like that.
> > 
> 
> You mean osd_cdb_offset_t. I thought of dropping that _t, I hate it,
> just a personal preference.

No, I mean osd_off_t :)  off vs offset is purely cosmetic, but in Linux
we have a strong preference for short typenames.  Just look how ugly
the prototype and struct defintion in your original posting look :)

Also I thing the _cdb is superflous because there is no other offset
type in the OSD spec.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/