[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801021556070.2990-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:58:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] : Allow embedded developers USB options
normally reserved for OTG
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > > perhaps the code size is arguable as to whether it really matters.
> > > the reason we want it is that we have a USB host controller that will
> > > not work with USB hubs, so we want to make sure the system does not
> > > attempt such things. (yes, such a USB host controller is retarded,
> > > but the decision was out of our hands.)
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, how does a host controller manage to avoid
> > working with external hubs?
>
> The transaction translators in external high speed hubs require
> hosts to issue particular USB transactions. If the host controller
> doesn't implement the that split transaction support, then it won't
> be supporting external hubs.
So in theory one could connect a high-speed hub to such a host
controller and expect it to communicate with high-speed devices. So
long as no full- or low-speed devices are added there wouldn't be any
split transactions. It wouldn't be USB-2.0 compliant but it should
still work.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists