linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801021259040.22538@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:59:29 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86_64: Use generic percpu

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> to get more test feedback: what would be the best way to get this tested 
> in x86.git in a standalone way? Can i just pick up these 10 patches and 
> remove all the non-x86 arch changes, and expect it to work - or are the 
> other percpu preparatory/cleanup patches in -mm needed too?

This is all you need. We intentionally did not include the other patches 
that go further.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/