[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102053814.GB25586@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 21:38:14 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@....de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Subject : Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5
> > Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@....de>
> > Date : 2007-12-13 16:27
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/13/392
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9557
> > Handled-By :
> > Patch :
>
> That strace shows that trying to open /dev/null fails with ENXIO:
>
> [pid 6050] open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY <unfinished ...>
> [pid 6050] <... open resumed> ) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or address)
>
> and everything goes downhill from there.
>
> It would be worth looking at your /dev/null to see what kind of (broken)
> device node it is, and get a clue about *why* it is broken.
>
> Greg, any udev breakage that could affect /dev/null?
I do not know of any such breakage.
But, as this is in a chroot, hopefully udev has properly populated the
chrooted /dev tree for the process to provide the /dev/null device node?
Tino, did you provide a /dev/ for your chroot? Did you use udev to
create it, or did you use a static /dev tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists