[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801031215.07145.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:15:05 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: nigel@...el.suspend2.net
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: freeze vs freezer
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 10:52:53 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> Hi.
>
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 03 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> >> On top of this, I made a (too simple at the moment) freeze_filesystems
> >> function which iterates through &super_blocks in reverse order, freezing
> >> fuse filesystems or ordinary ones. I say 'too simple' because it doesn't
> >> currently allow for the possibility of someone mounting (say) ext3 on
> >> fuse, but that would just be an extension of what's already done.
> >
> > How do you deal with fuse server tasks using other fuse filesystems?
>
> Since they're frozen in reverse order, the dependant one would be frozen
> first.
Say I do:
a) mount fuse on /tmp/first
b) mount fuse on /tmp/second
Then the server task for (a) does "ls /tmp/second". So it will be frozen,
right? How do you then freeze (a)? And keep in mind that the server task
may have forked.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists