linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [12/20] x86: Use a per cpu timer for correctable machine check checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801031356.09714.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:56:09 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [12/20] x86: Use a per cpu timer for correctable machine check checking

On Thursday 03 January 2008 11:49:56 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> > Previously the code used a single timer that then used 
> > smp_call_function to interrupt all CPUs while the original CPU was 
> > waiting for them.
> > 
> > But it is better / more real time and more power friendly to simply 
> > run individual timers on each CPU so they all do this independently.
> > 
> > This way no single CPU has to wait for all others.
> 
> i think we should unify this code first and provide it on 32-bit as 
> well.

That's done in another patch that hasn't been posted yet.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/