[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080103143711.GA29606@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:37:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl
* David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
> > tried to grep this way:
> >
> > grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
>
> Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people
> have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".
yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it:
>> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People
>> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists