[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080103170930.GA1728@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:09:30 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: malattia@...ux.it, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: struct should not be named same way as function in sony-laptop
On Thu 2008-01-03 11:15:43, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:01:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Naming struct and function by same name is evil. Rename the struct.
>
> Um... why? It's not even particulary bad style per se... Occurs less
> frequently than things like
> struct foo *foo;
> but nothing inherently terrible and not likely to cause any kind of
> confusion.
Well, it confused me a lot in this particular case...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists