lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477D3889.9070301@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:33:29 -0800
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
CC:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCIE ASPM support

Shaohua Li wrote:
> PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0
> state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state
> and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
> capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power reduction
> beyond what is achievable by software-only controlled power management.
> However, The device should be configured by software appropriately.
> Enabling ASPM will save power, but will introduce device latency.
> 
> This patch adds ASPM support in Linux. It introduces a global policy for
> ASPM, a sysfs file /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy can control
> it. The interface can be used as a boot option too. Currently we have
> below setting:
> 	-default, BIOS default setting
> 	-powersave, highest power saving mode, enable all available ASPM state
> and clock power management
> 	-performance, highest performance, disable ASPM and clock power
> management
> By default, the 'default' policy is used currently.
> 
> In my test, power difference between powersave mode and performance mode
> is about 1.3w in a system with 3 PCIE links.
> 
> please review, any comments will be appreciated.


quickly glanced this over since I recently disabled l1 ASPM for the e1000/e1000e
driven 82573 device which has issues with l1 ASPM. that immediately gives me the
question: how can I continue to disable 1l aspm by default for this device using
this infrastructure?

I do like the fact that there is a generic way to re-enable it for the users who
want to use it. Can this change be done when the device is already active? Can you
change this parameter per device/module?

> +	/* Clock PM state*/
> +	unsigned int clk_pm_capable:1;
> +	unsigned int clk_pm_enabled:1;
> +	unsigned int bios_clk_state:1;

might want to get rid of these bitfields?

Cheers,

Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ