[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1199391187.7561.38.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:13:07 -0500
From: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:56 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > If we've got time before 2.6.24 final, I'd wait on this a bit.
> > ib_srp:srp_remove_work() has them reversed as well, and I'm currently
> > tracking down why it oopses when the srp_remove_host() happens before
> > the scsi_remove_host(), which is the documented call sequence.
>
> I think the best thing to do is to merge this (assuming that Linus
> gets to it), since it looks quite safe and definitely fixes a crash.
> Then if we get to the root cause we can change the order of the calls
> if it turns out a different fix is required.
I've made progress on the root cause (posted in another thread), but we
need to fix ib_srp.c:srp_remove_work() as well, as I think it will have
the same issue. It will only be hit if we cannot reconnect to the
target, so it probably doesn't see a lot of use.
I'll send a new patch to you for just the ib_srp.c side.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists