lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801032242.01425.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:42:00 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, hbabu@...ibm.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: kexec refuses to boot latest -mm

On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:08:43AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:11:13AM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:27:39AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:15:32PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > > > Hi Vivek,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can't seem to get the latest -mm (2.6.24-rc6-mm1) to boot with
> > > > > kexec. It just gets stuck at "Starting new kernel".
> > > > > 
> > > > > It does boot normally when booted as the first kernel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any hints debugging? (x86 architecture)
> > > > 
> > > > I generally try few things.
> > > > 
> > > > - Specify earlyprintk= parameter for second kernel and see if control
> > > >   is reaching to second kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > - Otherwise specify --console-serial parameter on "kexec -l" commandline
> > > >   and it should display a message "I am in purgatory" on serial console.
> > > >   This will just mean that control has reached at least till purgatory.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Ok, so it reaches till here. I get "I'm in purgatory" on the console.
> > 
> > One more thing. Is 2.6.24-rc6 working properly?
> > 
> 
> 2.6.24-rc5 boots, so does 2.6.24-rc5-mm1. 2.6.24-rc6 does not boot, nor
> does 2.6.24-rc6-mm1. Its a regression.

Added to the list of reported regressions as:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9682

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ