[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1199402314.6854.0.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:18:34 -0500
From: Dave Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 18:11 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:20:09 -0500
> David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > index 950228f..6e7e3c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > @@ -423,8 +423,8 @@ static void srp_remove_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > list_del(&target->list);
> > spin_unlock(&target->srp_host->target_lock);
> >
> > - srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> > scsi_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> > + srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> > ib_destroy_cm_id(target->cm_id);
> > srp_free_target_ib(target);
> > scsi_host_put(target->scsi_host);
>
> These last two look suspicious. Are you freeing target before
> freeing target->scsi_host or does the code simply not do what
> it looks like it's doing? :)
>
> (no, I haven't looked at the IB code - I'm probably wrong)
srp_free_target_ib() just frees the buffers for the target, and
scsi_host_put() does the actual cleanup once the refcount drops to zero.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists