[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080103035942.GB26166@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:29:42 +0530
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, htejun@...il.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, maneesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-stable causes oomkiller to be invoked
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:54:12PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Just traced it again on my system: It is okay for the number of pages on
> the quicklist to reach the high count that we see (although the 16 bit
> limits are weird. You have around 4GB of memory in the system?). Up to
> 1/16th of free memory of a node can be allocated for quicklists (this
> allows the effective shutting down and restarting of large amounts of
> processes)
>
> The problem may be that this is run on a HIGHMEM system and the
> calculation of allowable pages on the quicklists does not take into
> account that highmem pages are not usable for quicklists (not sure about
> ZONE_MOVABLE on i386. Maybe we need to take that into account as well?)
>
> Here is a patch that removes the HIGHMEM portion from the calculation.
> Does this change anything:
>
Yep. This one hits it. I don't see the obvious signs of the oom
happening in the 5 mins I have run the script. I will let it run for
some more time.
Thanks!
--
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists