linux-kernel - Re: PATCH] adding wistron_btns support for X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <477C10AD.7060303@yahoo.fr>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:31:09 +0100
From:	Rémi Hérilier <rherilier@...oo.fr>
To:	Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dtor@...l.ru,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH] adding wistron_btns support for X86_64 systems.

Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> (CC'ing linux-input, as that is the relevant subsystem list for wistron-btns).
> 
> Rémi Hérilier wrote:
>> To use my previous patch (wistron_btns support for fujitsu-siemens amilo
>> pro edition v3505) with my laptop, I need to make the wistron module
>> compile for x86_64. It is based on Linux 2.4.24-rc4 too.
> 
> NAK.
> 
> You cannot make 32 bit BIOS calls in a 64 bit OS.
> 
> This will (and does) segfault on x86-64 (tested on my Aspire 5020, where  
> call_bios wistron-btns just segfaults on x86-64 with this patch).
> 
> This is a known issue, and the reason why wistron-btns (and the out-of-tree 
> acerhk) have not been ported to x86-64.
> 
> -Carlos

Yes, in theory, this must segfault on x86-64.

In pratice, there is one laptop where it seems to works (no problem
for 3 weeks). A good reason to find why.


Best regards

Remi Herilier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/