[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080104130702.GC20981@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:07:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] This patch to profile.c fixes a few errors reported by
checkpatch.pl
* Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com> wrote:
> paolo@...lo-desktop:~/linux-2.6/kernel$ ../scripts/checkpatch.pl
> --file profile.c
that's OK.
> What I still don't understand are the following options:
> --no-tree => run without a kernel tree
> --root => path to the kernel tree root
>
> Should I specify the path to the kernel tree root? If so, why?
it figures it out itself - if it cannot it will tell you.
> That said, the errors reported by checkpatch.pl are now:
> paolo@...lo-desktop:~/linux-2.6/kernel$ ../scripts/checkpatch.pl
> --terse --file profile.c |grep ERROR
> profile.c:128: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> I just forgot to fix it, very trivial. Will do in a minute.
>
> profile.c:460: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition (+ if
> (!(entry = create_proc_entry("XXXXXXXXXXXXX", 0600, root_irq_dir))))
> profile.c:594: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition (+ if
> (!(entry = create_proc_entry("XXXXXXX", S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, NULL))))
> Here I need an hint ( or an example) about how to fix these two errors :-)
transform:
if (!(x = y))
to:
x = y
if (!x)
i.e. take the implicit assignment out of the condition. (it's easy to
mistake it for '==' while reviewing the code and forgetting about the
assignment's side-effect)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists