[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080104132950.GB27330@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:29:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: isofs oops - d_splice_alias+0x1f (2.6.24-rc5-mm1)
* David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> > FWIW, this patch pile is getting ridiculous - it's what, original +
> > 2 fixes in -mm + mine + this one? Could you post the updated patch
> > with all fixes and fixes to fixes folded into it?
>
> I can, though Andrew usually objects to that.
folding often results in commit messages and hence credit lost - and
thus discourages test/review feedback and bugfixing. It's also easier to
see the track record/history of a patch if the fixes are in separate
patches. It's also easier to undo a 'fix' (and track the state/version
of changes) if it turns out to be a bad fix. If things get spaghetti
then a new splitup indeed helps (for larger patchsets), and Andrew
usually asks for a new splitup in that case. Andrew often folds patches
together right before sending it off to Linus (while constructing
combined credit - so credit is not lost).
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists