[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080104160445.GA27269@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:45 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hskinnemoen@...el.com,
bryan.wu@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Rework arch specific Makefiles to use mkubootimg
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:48:02AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> the mkubootimg tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>From the point of view of no overall change: Ack.
>From the point of view of whether we should have this in the kernel:
probably not.
See http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20071203.131631.85e7a1a5.en.html#20071203.131631.85e7a1a5
for a recent discussion on the ins and outs, multiple formats, options
and so forth passed to mk(u)image. It looks like we're heading for 5 or
6 different kernel image formats for the ARM architecture. ;(
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists