linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table II

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1199472453.4888.19.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:47:33 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] [5/16] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64
	early boot code with dynamic table II

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 19:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> But the problem with your "rule" is that every of the hundreds
> of Linux kernel contributors will need to do the same. And that's just 
> ineffecient, waste of valuable human work and just doesn't make much sense.
> 
> It certainly won't improve Linux in any way.

What I would prefer is a git option that supports
check-in/outs in a coding style of a user choice.

Commits should be white space ignorant.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/