[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801042107430.1253@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:09:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kbuild update
On Jan 4 2008 20:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> >
>> >On top of this I have my personal todo items such as:
>> >- modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others)
>>
>> Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises an "incompatible
>> pointer passed" on my side. Please explain :)
>
>htop is a nice ncurses based interface to top.
>
>Try "F2" and see a nice layout for a menu structure remotely
>similar to menuconfig.
I cannot really think how htop F2 would even be CLOSE to menuconfig.
Just that we are talking about the same thing:
http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX0/htopf2.png
hell no, menuconfig looks much nicer than that.
>I could mention a few more - this was more to say that there
>exist much beter looking ncurses based tools than menuconfig.
hm, I can only think of mc right now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists