[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801051255.51144.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:55:50 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > I have rebased gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> > on top of the $subject series, the result is appended. It has only been
> > compilation tested for now, but I'll be testing it for the next couple of days.
> >
> > Please review.
>
> I would prefer it if you could also merge in this patch at the same
> time:
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html
Makes sense, I will.
> > +void device_resume(void)
> > {
> > - sysdev_resume();
> > - dpm_power_up();
> > + might_sleep();
> > + dpm_resume();
> > + unlock_all_devices();
> > + unregister_dropped_devices();
> > + up_write(&pm_sleep_rwsem);
> > }
>
> With the aforementioned patch merged in, this will generate a
> warning for each dropped device. The call to
> unregister_dropped_devices() should come after the up_write().
>
> You might also consider adding a call to unregister_dropped_devices()
> in the error path of device_suspend() -- in theory even an aborted
> suspend might cause a device to malfunction.
In fact it already works like this, since device_suspend() now calls the entire
device_resume() on error.
> Otherwise this looks okay.
However, I think we don't need to wait with unregistering suspended devices
until after the other ones are resumed. We only need a special function for
unregistering suspended devices that will make the PM core release the device's
semaphore before unregistering it.
I have already sent a replacemet for
gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch that includes
some code from the $subject patch and implements the above idea:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/4/278
I'm going to merge it with your patch at:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html
and with patches [2/4] and [4/4] from the $subject series. I'll post the
result for a review later today.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists