[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080105124501.GA5704@gollum.tnic>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:45:01 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@...oo.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 02/10] ide-floppy: move ide-floppy struct and
macro defs into its own header. While at it
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Bart,
> Hmm, contrary to ide-cd.c case there doesn't seem to be a need currently for
> moving code out of ide-floppy.c (and this patch series doesn't change that).
?, you mean this patch series _does_ change that, meaning it moves the struct
defs into a header file. Do i get this correctly that we don't need the header
file and the struct defs should remain in the .c file?
> Besides it would be better to just remove some structs like it has been done
> with i.e. struct atapi_capabilities_page in ide-cd.c case [1] because:
[...]
> typedefs are evil (exceptions are rare) and should die :)
>
i'm redoing them right now against ide-2.6.git and will post when ready. By the
way, i have done some more cleanups in the meantime. Should i include them into
this series or send them later?
--
Regards/Gruß,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists