linux-kernel - Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3fxxb2r79.fsf@telia.com>
Date:	06 Jan 2008 11:17:46 +0100
From:	Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> Does a patch like this change the behaviour you see at all?

> +			bd_inode->i_size = (loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9;

It does fix my scenario, with the trivial fix of adding bdev-> at the
beginning of that line, ie:

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 993f78c..a8ed344 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static int do_open(struct block_device *bdev, struct file *file, int for_part)
 			}
 			if (bdev->bd_invalidated)
 				rescan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
+			bdev->bd_inode->i_size = (loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9;
 		}
 	}
 	bdev->bd_openers++;

-- 
Peter Osterlund - petero2@...ia.com
http://web.telia.com/~u89404340
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/