linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:56:53 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
> > Subject		: jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> > Submitter	: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
> > Date		: 2007-11-29 08:36
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53
> > 		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475
> > Handled-By	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132
> 
> this holds a series of problems, we've applied everything we wanted to 
> 2.6.24 already we'll do the full stack of fixes for this in 2.6.25. 
> (changing printk was deemed inappropriate so late in the -rc cycle) So 
> perhaps mark this as WILL_FIX_LATER and unmark it as a regression? 

I'll be fine with that if Stefano agrees.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/