[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801060147.48185.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 01:47:47 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Miguel Botón <mboton.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Miguel Botón wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned long regsp)
> +#else
> +asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int level, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +#endif
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> + volatile struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)®sp;
> + unsigned int level = regs->bx;
> +#endif
This #ifdef overload could probably be avoided if you just move
the body of this function into an extra place and do
static int do_iopl(unsigned int level, unsigned long *flags)
{
unsigned int old = (*flags >> 12) & 3;
...
*flags = (*flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IOPL) | (level << 12);;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned long regsp)
{
/* why is this volatle anyway? */
volatile struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)®sp;
unsigned int level = regs->bx;
return do_iopl(regs->bx, ®s->flags);
}
#else
asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int level, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return do_iopl(level, ®s->flags);
}
#endif
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists