linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:49:20 +0100
From:	Miguel Botón <mboton@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification -v2

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Miguel Botón <mboton@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> ioport_{32|64}.c unification.
>>
>> This patch unifies the code from the ioport_32.c and ioport_64.c 
>> files.
>>
>> Tested and working fine with i386 and x86_64 kernels.
> 
> in what way have you tested it? Have you tried iopl() and ioperm() 
> syscalls to check whether they properly block/allow port IO?
> 
> 	Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

I made a little app to check that iopl() and ioperm() were working properly.

---
	Miguel Botón
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/