linux-kernel - Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080106165640.GL20473@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:56:40 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:55:07PM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> This is the correct setup to trigger the bug. And the commit
> 6f5391c283d7fdcf24bf40786ea79061919d1e1d has nothing to do with this
> bug. It was bad luck that i couldn't trigger the bug with said commit
> reverted (in my tests, the second boot with the reverted commit missed
> the first mount/umount smaller cd step, so...)

Great.  Linus, can you revert the revert now?

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/