linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/5] Introduce _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080106091031.420c355d@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:10:31 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, olof@...om.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] Introduce __WARN()

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:09:44 +0100
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se> wrote:

> >> (btw, wouldn't 'var != 0' actually be the proper semantic instead
> >> of playing with '!'s?)
> >>     
> >
> > no because var could be a pointer for example...
> >   
> You mean because in that case it would be '!= NULL', do you? Sorry,
> do not see your point here.

my point is that you don't know which one to use.. 
But this isn't new discussion (nor something I'm changing at all); this has come
up since way back in 2005 :)
If you feel strongly of changing this, feel free to post a patch; for now I much
rather leave things as they are right now.


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/