[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801062159.20014.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:59:18 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc5: 'sysctl table check failed' when turning on printer
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Short of two programs coming in and simultaneously trying to claim
> the parallel port and there being not exclusion in ppdev.c I don't
> have a clue what could cause the reported error.
That could well be the root cause as the full log shows:
Jan 6 01:21:02 faramir kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: sysctl table check failed: /dev/parport/parport0/devices/ppdev0/timeslice Sysctl already exists
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: Pid: 11078, comm: hpijs Not tainted 2.6.24-rc6 #1
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel:
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: Call Trace:
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c104>] set_fail+0x3f/0x47
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5ba>] sysctl_check_table+0x4ae/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c0b6>] sysctl_check_lookup+0xc1/0xd0
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5d0>] sysctl_check_table+0x4c4/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c0b6>] sysctl_check_lookup+0xc1/0xd0
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5d0>] sysctl_check_table+0x4c4/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c0b6>] sysctl_check_lookup+0xc1/0xd0
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5d0>] sysctl_check_table+0x4c4/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c0b6>] sysctl_check_lookup+0xc1/0xd0
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5d0>] sysctl_check_table+0x4c4/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c0b6>] sysctl_check_lookup+0xc1/0xd0
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8024c5d0>] sysctl_check_table+0x4c4/0x4fb
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8023ca8d>] register_sysctl_table+0x52/0x9d
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff881ea7cb>] :parport:parport_device_proc_register+0xc3/0xe3
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff881e8da7>] :parport:parport_register_device+0x206/0x267
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff884151ae>] :ppdev:pp_irq+0x0/0x40
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8841574f>] :ppdev:pp_ioctl+0x13f/0x77c
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff80296a55>] do_ioctl+0x55/0x6b
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff80296cae>] vfs_ioctl+0x243/0x25c
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff80296d18>] sys_ioctl+0x51/0x71
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: [<ffffffff8020beee>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel:
Jan 6 01:21:03 faramir kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice
Jan 6 01:22:10 faramir kernel: ppdev0: released pardevice because user-space forgot
Jan 6 01:22:10 faramir kernel: ppdev0: unregistered pardevice
Jan 6 01:22:11 faramir kernel: ppdev0: unregistered pardevice
Jan 6 03:24:57 faramir kernel: fuse exit
Sorry for not providing that info earlier, but the first time I had this
issue I had two print jobs after eachother and because of that I overlooked
the double registering.
I am printing through CUPS on a fairly standard Debian unstable system
running the KDE desktop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists