linux-kernel - [patch 0/5] enhance WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080105190713.73745ec6@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:07:13 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	olof@...om.net, mingo@...e.hu, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: [patch 0/5] enhance WARN_ON series

3rd try for this patch series; now with a split up patch for __WARN_ON

This series has the goal of extending the usefulness of the WARN_ON() information,
at least on architectures that use the generic WARN_ON() infrastructure. (Those who
do their own thing either already have the extra information, or could consider
switching to the generic code). In order to do that, WARN_ON() first needs to 
be uninlined since there's like 1200 callsites and adding code to each of those
isn't pretty.

As part of this, I had to split the __WARN_ON patch in -mm into 2 pieces, one to 
introduce __WARN_ON, and a separate one to do the ifdef cleanup. 

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/