[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080105191245.06cb2d8a@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:12:45 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, olof@...om.net, mingo@...e.hu,
mpm@...enic.com
Subject: [patch 5/5] PowerPC: switch to generic WARN_ON / BUG_ON
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Not using the ppc-specific WARN_ON/BUG_ON constructs actually saves about
4K text on a ppc64_defconfig. The main reason seems to be that prepping
the arguments to the conditional trap instructions is more work than just
doing a compare and branch.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
include/asm-powerpc/bug.h | 37 -------------------------------------
1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc6/include/asm-powerpc/bug.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6.orig/include/asm-powerpc/bug.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6/include/asm-powerpc/bug.h
@@ -54,12 +54,6 @@
".previous\n"
#endif
-/*
- * BUG_ON() and WARN_ON() do their best to cooperate with compile-time
- * optimisations. However depending on the complexity of the condition
- * some compiler versions may not produce optimal results.
- */
-
#define BUG() do { \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: twi 31,0,0\n" \
@@ -69,20 +63,6 @@
for(;;) ; \
} while (0)
-#define BUG_ON(x) do { \
- if (__builtin_constant_p(x)) { \
- if (x) \
- BUG(); \
- } else { \
- __asm__ __volatile__( \
- "1: "PPC_TLNEI" %4,0\n" \
- _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY \
- : : "i" (__FILE__), "i" (__LINE__), "i" (0), \
- "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)), \
- "r" ((__force long)(x))); \
- } \
-} while (0)
-
#define __WARN() do { \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: twi 31,0,0\n" \
@@ -92,23 +72,6 @@
"i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry))); \
} while (0)
-#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \
- int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \
- if (__builtin_constant_p(__ret_warn_on)) { \
- if (__ret_warn_on) \
- __WARN(); \
- } else { \
- __asm__ __volatile__( \
- "1: "PPC_TLNEI" %4,0\n" \
- _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY \
- : : "i" (__FILE__), "i" (__LINE__), \
- "i" (BUGFLAG_WARNING), \
- "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)), \
- "r" (__ret_warn_on)); \
- } \
- unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
-})
-
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY __ */
#endif /* CONFIG_BUG */
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists