[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801061636.GFE34382.FLtOMSOFHVOFJQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:36:06 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: w@....eu
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
serue@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
Hello.
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Your patch is very confusing. In your description, as well as in the
> comments you talk about tmpfs, but your patch does not touch even one
> line of tmpfs and only changes ramfs. Even your variables and arguments
> refer to tmpfs. The Kconfig entry indicates that the feature depends
> on TMPFS too.
>
> Judging from the following comment :
> * Original tmpfs doesn't set ramfs_dir_inode_operations.setattr field.
>
> I suspect that you confuse both filesystems.
> - ramfs is in fs/ramfs and is always compiled in, you cannot disable it
> - tmpfs is in mm/shmem.c and is optional. It also supports options that
> ramfs does not (eg: size) and data may be swapped.
>
> Please understand that I'm not discussing the usefulness of your patch,
> I'm just trying to avoid a huge confusion.
Oh, I thought the filesystem mounted by "mount -t tmpfs none /tmp" is "tmpfs"
and the source code of "tmpfs" is located in fs/ramfs directory.
So, I should write the description as "an extension to ramfs" rather than
"an extension to tmpfs".
I'll fix it in next posting.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists