[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080107110904.GB28481@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:09:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: always create the kernel threads with normal
priority
> > This causes a practical problem. When a runaway real-time task is
> > eating 100% CPU and we attempt to put the CPU offline, sometimes we
> > block while waiting for the creation of the highest-priority
> > "kstopmachine" thread.
sched-devel.git has new mechanisms against runaway RT tasks. There's a
new RLIMIT_RTTIME rlimit - if an RT task exceeds that rlimit then it is
sent SIGXCPU.
there's also a new group scheduling extension that is driven via a
sysctl:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_ratio
this way if a user has a runaway RT task, other users (and root) will
still have some CPU time left. (in Peter's latest patchset that is
replaced via rt_runtime_ns - but this is a detail)
so instead of the never-ending arms race of kernel thread priorities
against RT task priorities, we are going towards making RT tasks safer
on a policy level.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists