[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1199705060.7143.27.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:24:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] another rt group sched update
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:51 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> - I occasionally see a weird lockup on iterating the task_groups list
> on smp machines. - I failed to see anything wrong, but hey, this
> stack of used brown paper bags is steadily growing.
D'oh
---
Don't add a task_group to the task_groups list for each cpu, there is
only a single task_group.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7175,6 +7175,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
init_defrootdomain();
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+ list_add(&init_task_group.list, &task_groups);
+#endif
+
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
struct rq *rq;
@@ -7201,8 +7205,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
init_tg_rt_entry(rq, &init_task_group,
&per_cpu(init_rt_rq, i),
&per_cpu(init_sched_rt_entity, i), i, 1);
-
- list_add(&init_task_group.list, &task_groups);
#endif
for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists