[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18306.17536.212405.674762@stoffel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:25:52 -0500
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"
I'll agree with what Willy wrote here, Bugzilla is a pain to use, you
can't just dump an email into it and have it captured. I think we
should be looking at something more like 'WebRT' which is an *issue*
tracker software. But that too might be too heavy weight and too
noisy as well.
And suddenly it would starting putting ticket numbers onto all the
non-problem conversations we have here on lkml as well, which I'm not
sure we really want.
Does it mean that we needs to have a 'bugs@...nel.org' email for
people to report bugs/problems/issues, while lkml remains (but is
copied for all 'bugs@...nel.org' emails) primarily the developer point
of contact?
The question to me really revolves around how do you automate the
process in a transparent manner so that people don't have to change
much how they interact with lkml.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists